WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.540 --> 00:00:03.589 A:middle L:90%
Okay, So this question wants us to compute this
2
00:00:03.589 --> 00:00:08.619 A:middle L:90%
anti derivative using technology and comparing that to the table
3
00:00:08.619 --> 00:00:13.449 A:middle L:90%
answer and showed that their equivalent So plugging into an
4
00:00:13.449 --> 00:00:16.660 A:middle L:90%
integral calculator, I was given this answer from a
5
00:00:16.660 --> 00:00:21.030 A:middle L:90%
computer algebra system. But when I plugged it into
6
00:00:21.030 --> 00:00:23.839 A:middle L:90%
a table, I was given this answer. So
7
00:00:23.839 --> 00:00:25.690 A:middle L:90%
as you can see these air pretty much the same
8
00:00:25.690 --> 00:00:30.149 A:middle L:90%
answer. But let's just rearrange the CS answer.
9
00:00:31.339 --> 00:00:35.079 A:middle L:90%
So we get negative e to the negative X over
10
00:00:35.079 --> 00:00:42.149 A:middle L:90%
, too. Is there first term and then plus
11
00:00:43.740 --> 00:00:50.770 A:middle L:90%
3/4 times the natural log of to E to the
12
00:00:50.770 --> 00:00:56.189 A:middle L:90%
minus. X plus three plus C. So this
13
00:00:56.189 --> 00:01:02.710 A:middle L:90%
was a very straightforward calculation because their computer algebra system
14
00:01:02.710 --> 00:01:06.250 A:middle L:90%
answer gave it in pretty much exact same form,
15
00:01:07.340 --> 00:01:10.260 A:middle L:90%
as we see in the table right here. So
16
00:01:10.269 --> 00:01:12.420 A:middle L:90%
since the answers match, we can say that the
17
00:01:12.420 --> 00:01:17.049 A:middle L:90%
two anti derivatives were given are indeed equivalent